De teloorgang van het poldermodel
Een verhaal van winnaars en verliezers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52024/tseg.17732Keywords:
waterschap, poldermodelAbstract
The myth was that, If there is one field in which the polder model prevailed, it would have to be the water management. Yet even there the historiography is evolving in the opposite direction: already in the 2000s, it was demonstrated that many polders and water boards were by no means paragons of consultation and participation, and that, if such participation existed, it declined considerably in importance from the late Middle Ages onwards. Just as society was unequal, participation in water management was unequal.
Translated with DeepL
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Tim Soens
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process.
Authors are explicitly encouraged to deposit their published article in their institutional repository.