Water, Politics and Society

A look at a major work: Consensus en conflict as seen from France

Authors

  • Raphaël Morera Centre de recherches historiques (CNRS-EHESS)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52024/tseg.17734

Abstract

Consensus en conflict takes stock of twenty years of research in Dutch environmental history and at the same time offers fruitful perspectives for the years to come. Since the Middle Ages, wetlands and marshes have been attractive areas for societies seeking to exploit their resources or to cultivate them. In Italy, Spain, England, the Germanic countries and France, impressive amounts of land were conquered from the water, sometimes explicitly inspired by the Dutch example. The works are old and temper the exceptionalist reading long promoted by Dutch historians. However, on the whole, they are oriented towards an understanding of the developments and the modalities of the transformations of the environments. In reality, these historiographies do not really question the daily functioning of the organisations exploiting the hydraulic commons. In this sense, Consensus en Conflict is a valuable source of inspiration and invites us to shift our focus.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Raphaël Morera, Centre de recherches historiques (CNRS-EHESS)

Raphaël Morera is a researcher at the CNRS and head of the Centre de recherches historiques (EHESS-CNRS). A specialist in the environmental history of the Early modern era, he mainly works on water management in wetlands and urban areas. In 2020, with Nicolas Lyon-Caen, he published a book devoted to the history of the Parisian environment: A vos poubelles citoyens! Environnement urbain, salubrité publique et investissement civique (Paris, XVIe-XVIIIe siècle).

Downloads

Published

2023-12-11

How to Cite

Morera, R. (2023). Water, Politics and Society : A look at a major work: Consensus en conflict as seen from France. TSEG - The Low Countries Journal of Social and Economic History, 20(3), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.52024/tseg.17734

Issue

Section

Debate Article