Inclusive and Extractive Institutions: A Reasonable Dichotomy?

Author(s)

  • Bas Spliet Antwerp University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52024/pw785a44

Abstract

Prak and Van Zanden argue that these differences of political culture are deeply embedded in history. The premise of their book is that the Dutch economy has been dominated by markets for centuries, but, moving beyond the singular focus on property rights and representative institutions associated with authors of the new institutional economics (NIE), they argue that state intervention, particularly after 1600, “restrained the capitalist impulse” and improved “the stability of the system”. The authors thereby reinforce a crucial insight that the absence of these predatory institutions on European soil, or the emancipation of the middle classes for that matter, were not the product of intellectual or moral advancement but rather a result of historical contingencies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Bas Spliet, Antwerp University

    Bas Spliet is a PhD candidate at the University of Antwerp and the Vrije Universiteit Brussel. He obtained his M.A. in history summa cum laude from the University of Ghent, where he also attained a B.A. in history and a B.A. in Arabic and Islamic Studies. In 2021, he received the André Schaepdrijver prize for best master’s thesis from the Oud-Studenten Geschiedenis Universiteit Gent, and in 2023 he was granted the Matthieu et al. scholarship for promising researchers by the University of Antwerp Research Council. He sits on the editorial board of Stadsgeschiedenis and is a member of the Centre for Urban History at the University of Antwerp.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-06

Issue

Section

Debate Article

How to Cite

Spliet, B. (2024). Inclusive and Extractive Institutions: A Reasonable Dichotomy?. TSEG - The Low Countries Journal of Social and Economic History, 21(2), 129-138. https://doi.org/10.52024/pw785a44